Replace International Journal of STEM Education with:
International Journal of STEM EducationUnited States
Annual Review of Applied LinguisticsUnited States
Cognition and InstructionUnited States
Studies in Science EducationUnited Kingdom
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative LearningUnited States
Mind Brain and EducationUnited States
Active Learning in Higher EducationUnited Kingdom
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher EducationUnited States
Journal of Research on Educational EffectivenessUnited States
International Journal of TestingUnited States
International Journal of STEM EducationUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Metacognition and Learning
Metacognition and Learning · 1×
×0.34.3kDEP
×1.211.9kEDUCA
×0.51.7kECP
×0.81.8kSP
×1.43.1kCSA
Citations per year, relative to Metacognition and Learning
Metacognition and Learning · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Metacognition and Learning
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Metacognition and Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Metacognition and Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metacognition and Learning more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Metacognition and Learning
This network shows the impact of papers published in Metacognition and Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Metacognition and Learning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.