Studies in Science Education

424 papers and 18.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 424 papers published in Studies in Science Education in the last decades have received a total of 18.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Science Education usually cover Education (293 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (184 papers) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (45 papers) specifically the topics of Science Education and Pedagogy (212 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (93 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Science Education are Rosalind Driver, Jonathan Osborne, Glen S. Aikenhead, Derek Hodson, Vanessa Kind, Richard A. Duschl, Joan Solomon, Troy D. Sadler, Paul L. Gardner and J. A. Easley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Science Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Science Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Science Education.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Science Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Science Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Science Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Science Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025