Mind Brain and Education

497 papers and 9.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 497 papers published in Mind Brain and Education in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Mind Brain and Education usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (273 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (226 papers) and Education (158 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (177 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (116 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mind Brain and Education are Mary Helen Immordino‐Yang, António R. Damásio, Wolfgang Schneider, Kurt W. Fischer, Kathy Hirsh‐Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, Usha Goswami, Nora S. Newcombe, Elena Pasquinelli and Patricia A. Alexander.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Mind Brain and Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mind Brain and Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mind Brain and Education.

Countries where authors publish in Mind Brain and Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mind Brain and Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mind Brain and Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mind Brain and Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025