Journal of Muscle Foods

592 papers and 9.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 592 papers published in Journal of Muscle Foods in the last decades have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Muscle Foods usually cover Animal Science and Zoology (549 papers), Food Science (189 papers) and Molecular Biology (101 papers) specifically the topics of Meat and Animal Product Quality (537 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (241 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Muscle Foods are C. Faustman, R. G. Cassens, A. Ouali, Shai Barbut, M.S. BREWER, F. K. McKeith, Curtis L. Kastner, Gabriel Monin, Matia B. Solomon and J. Claus.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Muscle Foods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Muscle Foods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Muscle Foods.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Muscle Foods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Muscle Foods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Muscle Foods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Muscle Foods more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025