Archives of Animal Nutrition

801 papers and 14.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 801 papers published in Archives of Animal Nutrition in the last decades have received a total of 14.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Archives of Animal Nutrition usually cover Animal Science and Zoology (407 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (289 papers) and Plant Science (166 papers) specifically the topics of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (354 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (272 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives of Animal Nutrition are Sven Dänicke, Wilfried Vahjen, Gerhard Flachowsky, Jürgen Zentek, Hana Valenta, Defa Li, Susanne Döll, M. Rodehutscord, Anne‐Helene Tauson and Anders Skrede.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archives of Animal Nutrition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives of Animal Nutrition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives of Animal Nutrition.

Countries where authors publish in Archives of Animal Nutrition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives of Animal Nutrition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives of Animal Nutrition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives of Animal Nutrition more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025