Current Protocols in Bioinformatics

379 papers and 46.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 379 papers published in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics in the last decades have received a total of 46.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics usually cover Molecular Biology (357 papers), Spectroscopy (57 papers) and Genetics (38 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (164 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (94 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics are Andrej Šali, Benjamin Webb, Nansheng Chen, Aaron R. Quinlan, David S. Wishart, Jianguo Xia, Maja Tarailo‐Graovac, Desmond G. Higgins, Ben Langmead and William R. Pearson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics.

Countries where authors publish in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Protocols in Bioinformatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Protocols in Bioinformatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025