William L. Roberts

2.1k citations
39 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 18

William L. Roberts

37 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

William L. Roberts
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Clinical Psychology 822
  • Social Psychology 721
  • Education 506
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 198
  • Pharmacy 66
Replace Anna‐Beth Doyle with:
Anna‐Beth Doyle Canada
Melanie C. Smith United States
Steven M. Alessandri United States
Jacquelyn Mize United States
Sanghag Kim United States
Celia A. Brownell United States
Natasha Whipple Canada
Allison J. Mostow United States
Amy L. Koenig United States
Geldolph A. Kohnstamm Netherlands
William L. Roberts relative to Anna‐Beth Doyle Canada Anna‐Beth Doyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Anna‐Beth Doyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Roberts. The network helps show where William L. Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William L. Roberts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William L. Roberts Line = papers co-authored together William L. Roberts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20192
2 20172
3
Overcoming the Challenges of Keeping Young People in Education: A wicked problem with implications for leadership, policy and practice
201611
4 201111
5 20083
6
Epistemological Beliefs of Teacher Credential Students.
20016
7
Vibration-induced kinesthetic illusions: A conflict between natural and artificial afferent inflow
20001
8 199941
9 19993
10 1996182
11 1996227
12 19932
13 19871
14 198717
15 19862
16 198629
17 198037
18 198025
19 19782
20 197678

About William L. Roberts

William L. Roberts is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (7 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers) and Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (822 citations), Social Psychology (721 citations) and Education (506 citations). William L. Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Janet Strayer, Christopher Davis, Gloria Ramírez, Susanne A. Denham, Ray Koopman, Stuart R. Hameroff, Arden F. Reynolds, Casey D. Blitt, Stefania Maggi and Amedeo D’Angiulli. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Social Development, Developmental Psychology, International Journal of Behavioral Development and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026