William Frey

27 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

William Frey
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Information Systems and Management 153
  • Media Technology 81
  • Safety Research 56
  • General Health Professions 72
  • Architecture 4
Replace Grant Fore with:
Grant Fore United States
Henk Zandvoort Netherlands
Matthew A. Holsapple United States
Rob M. Bielby United States
Roberta J. Herter United States
Amy Childress United States
Conrad Katzenmeyer United States
Sølvi Lillejord Norway
Inês Direito United Kingdom
Amy Slaton United States
William Frey relative to Grant Fore United States Grant Fore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Grant Fore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Frey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Frey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Frey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Frey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Frey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Frey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Frey. The network helps show where William Frey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside William Frey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Frey Line = papers co-authored together William Frey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200370
2 200548
3 200934
4 200825
5 200815
6 200813
7 200811
8 200810
9 200410
10 20066
11 20055
12 20204
13 20124
14 20103
15
Technology and Ethics: Some Lessons in Puerto Rico.
19983
16 20072
17
Implementing Bioeconomy with Electrobiorefinery
20162
18 20062
19
Ethics of Team Work
20072
20 20132

About William Frey

William Frey is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, General Energy, Media Technology, Architecture and Business and International Management, having authored 33 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (18 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 papers), Education, Technology, and Ethics (2 papers) and Organizational Change and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (153 citations), Media Technology (81 citations), Safety Research (56 citations), General Health Professions (72 citations) and Architecture (4 citations). William Frey has collaborated with scholars based in Puerto Rico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chuck Huff, Laura Barnard, Efraín O’Neill-Carrillo, Luís Ortiz Jiménez, Marla Perez‐Lugo, Alexander Golberg, Marcel Castro-Sitiriche, Chris Papadopoulos, Rafael A. Rodríguez–Solís and Miguel Ángel Medina Torres. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, PS Political Science & Politics, Risk Management and Healthcare Policy and Journal of Human Development and Capabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026