Chuck Huff

23 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Chuck Huff
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Information Systems and Management 173
  • Computer Science Applications 105
  • Safety Research 153
  • General Decision Sciences 13
  • Communication 37
Replace Nathan Beard with:
Nathan Beard United States
Harvey Mellar United Kingdom
Britte Haugan Cheng United States
Irene T. Miura United States
Serkan Şendağ Türkiye
Abraham E. Flanigan United States
Tim Roberts Australia
Silke Schworm Germany
Aimee Rickman United States
Cathy Ringstaff United States
Chuck Huff relative to Nathan Beard United States Nathan Beard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nathan Beard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chuck Huff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chuck Huff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chuck Huff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chuck Huff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chuck Huff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chuck Huff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chuck Huff. The network helps show where Chuck Huff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Chuck Huff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chuck Huff Line = papers co-authored together Chuck Huff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199579
2 199669
3 200548
4
Social Issues in Computing: Putting Computing in Its Place
199440
5 200238
6 199837
7 199625
8 200825
9 200815
10 201413
11 199613
12
Toward a design ethic for computing professionals
199411
13 199611
14 199610
15 199610
16 200310
17 20098
18 20145
19 20084
20 20034

About Chuck Huff

Chuck Huff is a scholar working on Safety Research, Information Systems and Management, Computer Science Applications, Library and Information Sciences and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 26 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (7 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (3 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (2 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (173 citations), Computer Science Applications (105 citations), Safety Research (153 citations), General Decision Sciences (13 citations) and Communication (37 citations). Chuck Huff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include C. Dianne Martin, William Frey, Keith Miller, Don Gotterbarn, Thomas A. Finholt, Nicholas Epley, Laura Barnard, Deborah G. Johnson, Sara Baase and Brent Jesiek. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Communications of the ACM, Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine and Journal of Geography in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026