Wendy M. Williams
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Education top 0.5%
- Gender Studies top 0.2%
- Safety Research top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Stephen J. CeciRobert J. SternbergSusan M. BarnettShulamit KahnDonna K. GintherJoseph A. HorvathRichard K. WagnerGeorge B. Forsythe
- Topics
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing (14 papers)Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (9 papers)Career Development and Diversity (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Wendy M. Williams
66 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
- Education 1.3k
- Gender Studies 1.3k
- Safety Research 1.1k
- Social Psychology 1.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Wendy M. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Wendy M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wendy M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wendy M. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wendy M. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wendy M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wendy M. Williams. The network helps show where Wendy M. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wendy M. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wendy M. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wendy M. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wendy M. Williams. Wendy M. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaborationbreakdown → | 51 |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 99 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations.breakdown → | 650 |
| 15 | Does Tenure Really Work | 4 |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | The nature-nurture debate : the essential readings | 39 |
| 20 | 7 |
About Wendy M. Williams
Wendy M. Williams is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 72 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (14 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (9 papers) and Career Development and Diversity (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.3k citations), Safety Research (1.1k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations). Wendy M. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Ceci, Robert J. Sternberg, Susan M. Barnett, Shulamit Kahn, Donna K. Ginther, Joseph A. Horvath, Richard K. Wagner, George B. Forsythe, Scott Snook and Jennifer Hedlund. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Psychological Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.