This map shows the geographic impact of Tyler S. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tyler S. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tyler S. Love more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tyler S. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tyler S. Love. The network helps show where Tyler S. Love may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tyler S. Love
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tyler S. Love.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tyler S. Love based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tyler S. Love. Tyler S. Love is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Love, Tyler S., et al.. (2020). Safety in STEM Education Standards and Frameworks: A Comparative Content Analysis.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 80(3). 34–38.11 indexed citations
Love, Tyler S., et al.. (2020). A Clearer View of Emergency Shower and Eyewash Station Requirements.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 80(1). 23–25.1 indexed citations
10.
Loveland, Thomas R., et al.. (2020). Jackson's Mill to Chinsegut: The Journey to STEL.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 79(5). 8–13.3 indexed citations
11.
Love, Tyler S.. (2019). Safety Perspectives and Resources from across the Pond.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 78(5). 34–37.2 indexed citations
12.
Love, Tyler S., et al.. (2019). The Crumble: Integrating Computer Science through Engineering Design.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 79(2). 16–22.4 indexed citations
13.
Love, Tyler S., et al.. (2019). Developing a Culture of Safety Through Departmental Planning.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 79(1). 22–25.2 indexed citations
14.
Love, Tyler S., et al.. (2017). Tools and Equipment in Nontraditional Spaces: Safety and Liability Issues.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 76(8). 26–27.5 indexed citations
15.
Love, Tyler S.. (2017). Perceptions of Teaching Safer Engineering Practices: Comparing the Influence of Professional Development Delivered by Technology and Engineering, and Science Educators.. ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries). 26(1). 21–31.12 indexed citations
16.
Loveland, Thomas R. & Tyler S. Love. (2017). Technological Literacy: The Proper Focus to Educate All Students.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 76(4). 13–17.1 indexed citations
17.
Love, Tyler S. & Carlos Vargas‐Salgado. (2016). Teaching Construction: A Design-Based Course Model.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 75(8). 22–28.1 indexed citations
18.
Love, Tyler S., et al.. (2016). Better Practices for Recruiting T&E Teachers.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 76(1). 10–15.4 indexed citations
19.
Love, Tyler S. & Greg Strimel. (2013). An Elementary Approach to Teaching Wind Power.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 72(4). 8–14.3 indexed citations
20.
Love, Tyler S., et al.. (2011). Utilize Vacuum Forming to Make Interdisciplinary Connections.. Technology and Engineering Teacher. 71(3). 30–34.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.