Tom Novak
About
In The Last Decade
Tom Novak
4 papers receiving 349 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Marketing 202
- Sociology and Political Science 187
- Information Systems and Management 139
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 106
- Strategy and Management 77
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Novak
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Novak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Novak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Novak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Novak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Novak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Novak. The network helps show where Tom Novak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Novak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Novak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Novak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Novak. Tom Novak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 156 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | How to acquire customers on the Web. | 207 |
| 4 | BUILDING CUSTOMER TRUST ONLINE | 26 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.