Ting Yu
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 1%
- Marketing top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 2%
- Co-authors
- Alison DeanChristopher WhiteKo de RuyterPaul G. PattersonDebbie KeelingYiu‐Kuen TseChing‐Fu ChenSiegfried P. Gudergan
- Topics
- Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (11 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementMarketingInformation Systems and Management
- Partner nations
- AustraliaChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ting Yu
33 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 746
- Marketing 607
- Sociology and Political Science 432
- Strategy and Management 204
- Information Systems and Management 172
Countries citing papers authored by Ting Yu
This map shows the geographic impact of Ting Yu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ting Yu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ting Yu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ting Yu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ting Yu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ting Yu. The network helps show where Ting Yu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ting Yu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ting Yu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ting Yu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ting Yu. Ting Yu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Ting Yu
Ting Yu is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Marketing, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (11 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (746 citations), Marketing (607 citations) and Information Systems and Management (172 citations). Ting Yu has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alison Dean, Christopher White, Ko de Ruyter, Paul G. Patterson, Debbie Keeling, Yiu‐Kuen Tse, Ching‐Fu Chen, Siegfried P. Gudergan, Lorenz King and Kan Yu. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Business Research and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.