Tina C. Ambos

3.7k citations
39 papers · 2.6k indexed · h-index 22

Tina C. Ambos

36 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Tina C. Ambos
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Strategy and Management 1.9k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 684
  • Business and International Management 187
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 652
  • Accounting 594
Replace Björn Ambos with:
Björn Ambos Austria
Shameen Prashantham China
Helena Yli‐Renko United States
Pol Herrmann United States
Martina Musteen United States
Olli Kuivalainen Finland
Mika Gabrielsson Finland
Mona Makhija United States
Seemantini Pathak United States
Jane E. Salk United States
Tina C. Ambos relative to Björn Ambos Austria Björn Ambos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Björn Ambos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tina C. Ambos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina C. Ambos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina C. Ambos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina C. Ambos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina C. Ambos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina C. Ambos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina C. Ambos. The network helps show where Tina C. Ambos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tina C. Ambos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tina C. Ambos Line = papers co-authored together Tina C. Ambos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20240
4 20244
5 20236
6 20233
7 202232
8 202159
9 202064
10 20191
11 201941
12 20180
13 201692
14 2015190
15 201361
16 201153
17 201077
18 2009323
19 200915
20
Managing executive attention in the global company
200751

About Tina C. Ambos

Tina C. Ambos is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Accounting, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (23 papers), International Business and FDI (15 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (5 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (5 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (1.9k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (684 citations), Business and International Management (187 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (652 citations) and Accounting (594 citations). Tina C. Ambos has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Björn Ambos, Julian Birkinshaw, Bodo B. Schlegelmilch, Ulf Andersson, Sascha Kraus, Kristiina Mäkelä, Pablo D’Este, Thorsten Semrau, Cyril Bouquet and Felix Eggers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Management Studies, Journal of International Management, Global Strategy Journal, Journal of World Business and Journal of International Business Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026