Global Strategy Journal

357 papers and 13.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 357 papers published in Global Strategy Journal in the last decades have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Strategy Journal usually cover Strategy and Management (306 papers), Accounting (158 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (73 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (226 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (166 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (151 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Strategy Journal are Ravi Ramamurti, Álvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Ram Mudambi, Jean‐François Hennart, Mike W. Peng, Timothy J. Sturgeon, Anoop Madhok, Mohammad Keyhani, Vijay Govindarajan and Rajneesh Narula.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Strategy Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Strategy Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Strategy Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Global Strategy Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Strategy Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Strategy Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Strategy Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025