Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework
2015363 citationsTania Broadley et al.Teaching and Teacher Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Tania Broadley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tania Broadley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tania Broadley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tania Broadley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tania Broadley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tania Broadley. The network helps show where Tania Broadley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tania Broadley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tania Broadley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tania Broadley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tania Broadley. Tania Broadley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gibson, David, et al.. (2018). Evolving learning paradigms: Re-setting baselines and collection methods of information and communication technology in education statistics. Educational Technology & Society. 21(2). 62–73.23 indexed citations
Broadley, Tania & Susan Ledger. (2012). An Online Community to Support Future Makers in Educational Reform. eSpace (Curtin University). 152–158.
13.
Johnson, Genevieve Marie & Tania Broadley. (2011). Learning style and digital activity: an ecological study. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 2011(1). 643–656.3 indexed citations
14.
Broadley, Tania, et al.. (2010). Connecting and collaborating in regional, rural and remote Western Australia. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 25(2). 22–25.2 indexed citations
15.
Pelliccione, Lina & Tania Broadley. (2010). R U there yet?. ASCILITE Publications. 749–760.1 indexed citations
16.
Broadley, Tania. (2010). Digital Revolution or Digital Divide. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education. 20(2). 63–76.7 indexed citations
17.
Broadley, Tania. (2010). Digital revolution or digital divide: Will rural teachers get a piece of the professional development pie?. eSpace (Curtin University). 20(2). 63–76.15 indexed citations
18.
Broadley, Tania, et al.. (2009). What can nature teach us? Connecting digitally to improve learning outcomes. eSpace (Curtin University). 103–109.1 indexed citations
19.
Broadley, Tania, et al.. (2009). The Hot Topic Community: Videoconferencing to reduce the professional isolation of teachers in rural Western Australia. eSpace (Curtin University). 76–84.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.