Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Attachment and Loss: Sadness and Depression
1982770 citationsStuart Albert, John BowlbyJournal of Marriage and the Familyprofile →
Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges
2000633 citationsStuart Albert, Blake E. Ashforth et al.Academy of Management Reviewprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Albert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Albert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Albert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Albert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Albert. The network helps show where Stuart Albert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Albert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Albert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Albert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Albert. Stuart Albert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Albert, Stuart. (2013). WHEN : THE ART OF PERFECT TIMING. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).27 indexed citations
Albert, Stuart & Geoffrey G. Bell. (2002). Timing and Music. Academy of Management Review. 27(4). 574–574.7 indexed citations
4.
Albert, Stuart & Geoffrey G. Bell. (2002). Timing and Music. Academy of Management Review. 27(4). 574–593.25 indexed citations
5.
Albert, Stuart, Blake E. Ashforth, & Jane E. Dutton. (2000). Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges. Academy of Management Review. 25(1). 13–17.633 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Zaheer, Srilata, Stuart Albert, & Akbar Zaheer. (1999). Time Scales and Organizational Theory. Academy of Management Review. 24(4). 725–725.137 indexed citations
7.
Zaheer, Srilata, Stuart Albert, & Akbar Zaheer. (1999). Time Scales and Organizational Theory. Academy of Management Review. 24(4). 725–741.275 indexed citations
8.
Rosenblatt, Paul C. & Stuart Albert. (1990). Management and Succession:. Marriage & Family Review. 15(3-4). 161–170.3 indexed citations
Albert, Stuart & John Bowlby. (1982). Attachment and Loss: Sadness and Depression. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 44(1). 248–248.770 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Addington, Larry H., Stuart Albert, & Edward C. Luck. (1982). On the Endings of Wars. The History Teacher. 15(2). 295–295.4 indexed citations
15.
Albert, Stuart & Suzanne J. Kessler. (1978). Ending social encouters. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 14(6). 541–553.38 indexed citations
Albert, Stuart. (1971). Interpretation of temporal trends.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 18(3). 311–322.3 indexed citations
20.
Albert, Stuart & James M. Dabbs. (1970). Physical distance and persuasion.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 15(3). 265–270.57 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.