Stephen Pike

1.8k total citations
26 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Stephen Pike is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Pike has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Strategy and Management, 2 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 1 paper in Communication. Recurrent topics in Stephen Pike's work include Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (17 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (13 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (7 papers). Stephen Pike is often cited by papers focused on Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (17 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (13 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (7 papers). Stephen Pike collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Taiwan and United States. Stephen Pike's co-authors include Göran Roos, Bernard Marr, Lisa Fernström, Tzu‐Ju Ann Peng, Oliver Gupta, Andy Neely, Anne Fletcher, James Guthrie, Peter Steane and Denis J. Murphy and has published in prestigious journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Remote Sensing and British Journal of Management.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Pike

24 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Stephen Pike	875	151	129	116	114	26	1.2k
Joseph T. Mahoney	692 0.8×	144 1.0×	271 2.1×	271 2.3×	189 1.7×	8	1.3k
Frank Bradley	874 1.0×	113 0.7×	208 1.6×	144 1.2×	283 2.5×	24	1.2k
Maria Mårtensson	479 0.5×	215 1.4×	132 1.0×	39 0.3×	161 1.4×	40	917
Peter Enderwick	711 0.8×	93 0.6×	239 1.9×	193 1.7×	199 1.7×	72	1.2k
Camilo José Vázquez Ordás	723 0.8×	148 1.0×	87 0.7×	125 1.1×	453 4.0×	66	1.2k
Agnieszka Chidlow	512 0.6×	76 0.5×	118 0.9×	120 1.0×	158 1.4×	23	837
John F. Preble	623 0.7×	74 0.5×	93 0.7×	106 0.9×	234 2.1×	34	1.2k
Eduardo Bueno Campos	614 0.7×	48 0.3×	144 1.1×	171 1.5×	193 1.7×	132	959
Tieying Yu	596 0.7×	54 0.4×	285 2.2×	154 1.3×	160 1.4×	19	943
Phani Tej Adidam	603 0.7×	141 0.9×	55 0.4×	74 0.6×	299 2.6×	22	946

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Pike

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Pike

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Pike. The network helps show where Stephen Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Pike. Stephen Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Roos, Göran & Stephen Pike. (2018). Intellectual Capital as a Management Tool. 7 indexed citations

Roos, Göran & Stephen Pike. (2018). Intellectual Capital as a Management Tool: Essentials for Leaders and Managers. CERN Bulletin. 4 indexed citations

Roos, Göran & Stephen Pike. (2011). The relationship between university research and firm innovation. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 4 indexed citations

Peng, Tzu‐Ju Ann, et al.. (2011). Is Cooperation with Competitors a Good Idea? An Example in Practice. British Journal of Management. 23(4). 532–560. 114 indexed citations

Pike, Stephen, et al.. (2011). Object-Based Image Analysis for Detection of Japanese Knotweed s.l. taxa (Polygonaceae) in Wales (UK). Remote Sensing. 3(2). 319–342. 41 indexed citations

Neely, Andy, Andy Neely, Andy Neely, et al.. (2007). Business Performance Measurement. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 61 indexed citations

Roos, Göran, et al.. (2007). Information needs of internal and external stakeholders and how to respond: reporting on operations and intellectual capital. International Journal of Accounting Auditing and Performance Evaluation. 4(4/5). 529–529. 13 indexed citations

Peng, Tzu‐Ju Ann, Stephen Pike, & Göran Roos. (2007). Intellectual capital and performance indicators: Taiwanese healthcare sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 8(3). 538–556. 105 indexed citations

Pike, Stephen, Göran Roos, & Bernard Marr. (2005). Strategic Management of Intangible Assets and Value Drivers in R&D Organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal. 32 indexed citations

10.

Pike, Stephen, Lisa Fernström, & Göran Roos. (2005). Intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 6(4). 489–509. 34 indexed citations

11.

Roos, Göran, Stephen Pike, & Lisa Fernström. (2005). Valuation and reporting of intangibles ? state of the art in 2004. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital. 2(1). 21–21. 16 indexed citations

12.

Pike, Stephen, Göran Roos, & Bernard Marr. (2005). Strategic management of intangible assets and value drivers in R&D organizations. R and D Management. 35(2). 111–124. 110 indexed citations

13.

Fletcher, Anne, James Guthrie, Peter Steane, Göran Roos, & Stephen Pike. (2005). Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organisation. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 10. 191. 2 indexed citations

14.

Marr, Bernard, Göran Roos, Andy Neely, Stephen Pike, & Oliver Gupta. (2004). Hacia la tercera generación en la medida de resultados. 31–46. 1 indexed citations

15.

Roos, Göran, Lisa Fernström, & Stephen Pike. (2004). Human resource management and business performance measurement. Measuring Business Excellence. 8(1). 28–37. 39 indexed citations

16.

Gupta, Oliver, et al.. (2003). INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND IMPROVED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 3 indexed citations

17.

Neely, Andy, Bernard Marr, Göran Roos, Stephen Pike, & Oliver Gupta. (2003). Towards the Third Generation of Performance Measurement. Controlling. 15(3-4). 129–136. 53 indexed citations

18.

Fletcher, Anne, James Guthrie, Peter Steane, Göran Roos, & Stephen Pike. (2003). Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 4(4). 505–527. 117 indexed citations

19.

Pike, Stephen, et al.. (2002). Home Alone: Uncovering the extent and value of Home-Based business in Regional Communities. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 7 indexed citations

20.

Pike, Stephen, et al.. (2001). Accounting, empirical measurement and intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2(3). 246–260. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact