Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know?
1999799 citationsDemetrios Vakratsas, Tim Amblerprofile →
Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Ambler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Ambler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Ambler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Ambler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Ambler. The network helps show where Tim Ambler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Ambler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Ambler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Ambler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Ambler. Tim Ambler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clark, Bruce H. & Tim Ambler. (2011). Managing the Marketing Metrics Portfolio. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
2.
Neely, Andy, David Otley, Bruce H. Clark, et al.. (2007). Business Performance Measurement. Cambridge University Press eBooks.61 indexed citations
Chittenden, Francis, et al.. (2004). Are Regulators Raising Their Game? Regulatory Impact Assessments in 2002/3. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
6.
Chittenden, Francis, et al.. (2003). Government Policy for SMEs: do regulators 'think small first'?. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).1 indexed citations
7.
Chittenden, Francis, et al.. (2003). Do Regulators Play By the Rules? An Audit of the Government's Regulatory Impact Assessment System. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
8.
Neely, Andy, David Otley, Bruce R. Clark, et al.. (2002). Business Performance Measurement. Cambridge University Press eBooks.254 indexed citations
9.
Netemeyer, Richard G., Peter M. Bentler, Richard P. Bagozzi, et al.. (2001). Structural Equations Modeling. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 10(1-2). 83–100.62 indexed citations
Ambler, Tim & Debra Riley. (2000). Marketing Metrics: A Review of Performance Measures in Use in the UK and Spain.19 indexed citations
12.
Kokkinaki, Flora & Tim Ambler. (1999). Marketing performance assessment : an exploratory investigation into current practice and the role of firm orientation. London Business School Research Online (London Business School).25 indexed citations
Ambler, Tim. (1997). Do brands benefit consumers?. International Journal of Advertising. 16(3). 167–198.25 indexed citations
17.
Ambler, Tim. (1997). Do Brands Benefit Consumers?. International Journal of Advertising. 16(3). 167–198.38 indexed citations
18.
Vakratsas, Demetrios & Tim Ambler. (1996). Advertising effects : a taxonomy and review of concepts, methods, and results from the academic literature : working paper. Marketing Science Institute eBooks.10 indexed citations
19.
Ambler, Tim, et al.. (1996). The employer brand. Journal of Brand Management. 4(3). 185–206.703 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.