Countries citing papers authored by Stephen N. Elliott
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen N. Elliott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen N. Elliott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen N. Elliott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen N. Elliott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen N. Elliott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen N. Elliott. The network helps show where Stephen N. Elliott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen N. Elliott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen N. Elliott.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen N. Elliott based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen N. Elliott. Stephen N. Elliott is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Elliott, Stephen N. & James C. DiPerna. (2002). Assessing the Academic Competence of College Students: Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Skills and Enablers.. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 15(2). 87–100.6 indexed citations
9.
DiPerna, James C. & Stephen N. Elliott. (1999). Development and validation of the academic competence evaluation scales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 17(3). 207–225.2 indexed citations
Elliott, Stephen N.. (1998). Performance Assessment of Students' Achievement: Research and Practice.. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 13(4).4 indexed citations
12.
Elliott, Stephen N. & Lynn S. Fuchs. (1997). The Utility of Curriculum-Based Measurement and Performance Assessment as Alternatives to Traditional Intelligence and Achievement Tests.. School Psychology Review. 26(2). 224–233.36 indexed citations
13.
Elliott, Stephen N.. (1995). Creating Meaningful Performance Assessments. ERIC Digest E531..11 indexed citations
14.
Doll, Beth & Stephen N. Elliott. (1994). Research Methods: Representativeness of Observed Preschool Social Behaviors: How Many Data Are Enough?.. Journal of Early Intervention. 18(2).3 indexed citations
15.
Zins, Joseph E., Thomas R. Kratochwill, & Stephen N. Elliott. (1993). Handbook of Consultation Services for Children: Applications in Educational and Clinical Settings. Medical Entomology and Zoology.46 indexed citations
Elliott, Stephen N., James V. Mitchell, & Barbara S. Plake. (1984). Preface: Social and Technical Issues in Testing: Implications for Test Construction and Usage. Insecta mundi.4 indexed citations
18.
Gresham, Frank M. & Stephen N. Elliott. (1984). Assessment and Classification of Children's Social Skills: A Review of Methods and Issues.. School Psychology Review. 13(3). 292–301.159 indexed citations
19.
Kratochwill, Thomas R., Stephen N. Elliott, & Maribeth Gettinger. (1981). Advances in school psychology.302 indexed citations
20.
Elliott, Stephen N., et al.. (1981). Validity of the SRBCSS for Hispanic and Anglo Gifted Students..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.