Stephen L. Jones
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Stanley E. FawcettAmydee M. FawcettPriti Pradhan ShahGurneeta VasudevaAndrew H. Van de VenAija LeiponenCynthia WallinAmanda Ferguson
- Topics
- Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers)Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers)Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaStrategic Management JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Stephen L. Jones
16 papers receiving 646 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Strategy and Management 334
- Management Information Systems 171
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 146
- Sociology and Political Science 115
- Social Psychology 82
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Jones. The network helps show where Stephen L. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen L. Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen L. Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen L. Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen L. Jones. Stephen L. Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 112 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 221 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 31 |
About Stephen L. Jones
Stephen L. Jones is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 17 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers) and Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (334 citations), Management Information Systems (171 citations) and Business and International Management (29 citations). Stephen L. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stanley E. Fawcett, Amydee M. Fawcett, Priti Pradhan Shah, Gurneeta Vasudeva, Andrew H. Van de Ven, Aija Leiponen, Cynthia Wallin, Amanda Ferguson, Randall S. Peterson and Elizabeth Alexander. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Strategic Management Journal and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.