Manuela Pérez‐Pérez
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Topics
- Work-Family Balance Challenges (7 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Manuela Pérez‐Pérez
19 papers receiving 537 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Strategy and Management 222
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 182
- Sociology and Political Science 178
- Economics and Econometrics 112
- Management of Technology and Innovation 107
Countries citing papers authored by Manuela Pérez‐Pérez
This map shows the geographic impact of Manuela Pérez‐Pérez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manuela Pérez‐Pérez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manuela Pérez‐Pérez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Manuela Pérez‐Pérez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Manuela Pérez‐Pérez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Manuela Pérez‐Pérez. The network helps show where Manuela Pérez‐Pérez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Manuela Pérez‐Pérez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Manuela Pérez‐Pérez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Manuela Pérez‐Pérez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Manuela Pérez‐Pérez. Manuela Pérez‐Pérez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 55 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 84 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | Revisiones de código en el contexto del aseguramiento de calidad. Un caso práctico | 0 |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 79 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 76 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Manuela Pérez‐Pérez
Manuela Pérez‐Pérez is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 20 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (7 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (182 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (107 citations) and Strategy and Management (222 citations). Manuela Pérez‐Pérez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Mexico and Lithuania. Frequent co-authors include Angel Martı́nez Sánchez, Vida Davidavičienė, María José Escalona and Julio Ponce. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Management Studies and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.