Stephen Drew

2.1k citations
34 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 17

Stephen Drew

34 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Stephen Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Strategy and Management 604
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 384
  • Information Systems and Management 228
  • Management Information Systems 247
  • Marketing 246
Replace Zhiping Walter with:
Zhiping Walter United States
Peter J. Sher Taiwan
T.J. Kamalanabhan India
Michael Scott Garver United States
Kongkiti Phusavat Thailand
Muammer Ozer Hong Kong
Sany Sanuri Mohd Mokhtar Malaysia
Eva Martínez Spain
Arthur H. Money South Africa
Ward Hanson United States
Stephen Drew relative to Zhiping Walter United States Zhiping Walter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Zhiping Walter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Drew. The network helps show where Stephen Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Drew Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20207
2 20207
3 20208
4 20113
5 20116
6 201171
7 200716
8 200679
9 200655
10 20041
11 20024
12 199978
13 1997193
14 19978
15 199612
16 199597
17 199520
18 199558
19 199557
20 197552

About Stephen Drew

Stephen Drew is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Business and International Management, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (12 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (3 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (3 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers) and Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (604 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (384 citations), Information Systems and Management (228 citations), Management Information Systems (247 citations) and Marketing (246 citations). Stephen Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter A.C. Smith, Patricia C. Kelley, M.G. Singh, Colin Coulson‐Thomas, Marilys Guillemin, Deborah Warr, Susan Cox, Catherine Howell, Jenny Waycott and William J. Ritchie. Their work appears in journals such as Long Range Planning, Journal of General Management, Journal of Management Development, Vaccine and European Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026