Journal of General Management

1.0k papers and 12.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Journal of General Management in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of General Management usually cover Strategy and Management (321 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (233 papers) and Accounting (123 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (134 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (96 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of General Management are John M.T. Balmer, Heledd Jenkins, Reijo Luostarinen, Lawrence S. Welch, Yao-Su Hu, Birger Wernerfelt, Roy Rothwell, Ariane Berthoin Antal, Malcolm Warner and T. K. Das.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of General Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of General Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of General Management.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of General Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of General Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of General Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of General Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025