Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education
Countries citing papers authored by Sten Ludvigsen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Ludvigsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Ludvigsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Ludvigsen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Ludvigsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Ludvigsen. The network helps show where Sten Ludvigsen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sten Ludvigsen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sten Ludvigsen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sten Ludvigsen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sten Ludvigsen. Sten Ludvigsen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gresalfi, Melissa, Corey Brady, Crina Damşa, et al.. (2019). Theorizing and Measuring Collective Productive Disciplinary Engagement. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).1 indexed citations
Carr, Tony & Sten Ludvigsen. (2017). Disturbances and Contradictions in an Online Conference.. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (The University of the West Indies). 13(2). 116–140.6 indexed citations
Rosé, Carolyn Penstein, Sten Ludvigsen, Nancy Law, Ulrike Creß, & Gerry Stahl. (2017). Divisive or facilitative: The two faces of technology in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 12(3). 215–220.3 indexed citations
13.
Damşa, Crina & Sten Ludvigsen. (2011). Learning Through Collaborative Creation of Knowledge Objects in Teacher Education.. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.1 indexed citations
Ludvigsen, Sten. (2005). Situating Collaborative Learning: Educational Technology in the Wild. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 45(5). 39–43.3 indexed citations
18.
Arnseth, Hans Christian, Sten Ludvigsen, Anders I. Mørch, & Barbara Wasson. (2004). Managing Intersubjectivity in Distributed Collaboration.. 2. 189–204.6 indexed citations
19.
Hoppe, Ulrich, et al.. (2004). Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series). Springer eBooks.2 indexed citations
20.
Wasson, Barbara, Sten Ludvigsen, & Ulrich Hoppe. (2003). Designing for change in networked learning environments : proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.40 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.