Shih‐Chieh Fang
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Chen‐Wei YangJulia L. LinMing‐Chao WangYen‐Ting Helena ChiuWen-Yen HsuFu-Sheng TsaiPeter LokJo Rhodes
- Topics
- Innovation and Knowledge Management (17 papers)Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (7 papers)Knowledge Management and Sharing (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Shih‐Chieh Fang
36 papers receiving 598 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Strategy and Management 321
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 173
- Sociology and Political Science 137
- Communication 118
- Management of Technology and Innovation 110
Countries citing papers authored by Shih‐Chieh Fang
This map shows the geographic impact of Shih‐Chieh Fang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shih‐Chieh Fang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shih‐Chieh Fang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shih‐Chieh Fang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shih‐Chieh Fang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shih‐Chieh Fang. The network helps show where Shih‐Chieh Fang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shih‐Chieh Fang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shih‐Chieh Fang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shih‐Chieh Fang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shih‐Chieh Fang. Shih‐Chieh Fang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | How public-private partnerships co-create value: The case of cultural and creative industry | 2 |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | How technologies and capability co-evolve: The example of lithium battery industry evolution in Taiwan | 1 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 80 | |
| 18 | The Paradox of Threat and Organizational Inertia | 1 |
| 19 | 86 | |
| 20 | Social Capital, Organizational Learning Capability, and Technological Knowledge Transfer | 0 |
About Shih‐Chieh Fang
Shih‐Chieh Fang is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Communication and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 37 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (17 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (7 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (321 citations), Business and International Management (42 citations) and Communication (118 citations). Shih‐Chieh Fang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Chen‐Wei Yang, Julia L. Lin, Ming‐Chao Wang, Yen‐Ting Helena Chiu, Wen-Yen Hsu, Fu-Sheng Tsai, Peter Lok, Jo Rhodes, Richard Yu‐Yuan Hung and Hwan‐Yann Su. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Information Management and Technovation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.