Technovation

3.0k papers and 137.7k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Technovation in the last decades have received a total of 137.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Technovation usually cover Strategy and Management (1.4k papers), Economics and Econometrics (887 papers) and Management of Technology and Innovation (866 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (1.1k papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (430 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (410 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technovation are George Hayward, K.R.E. Huizingh, John Bessant, Amrik S. Sohal, David Francis, Elias G. Carayannis, Rajneesh Narula, María J. Nieto, Lluis Santamaría and Kurt Matzler.

In The Last Decade

Technovation

2.6k papers receiving 118.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Technovation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technovation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technovation.

Countries where authors publish in Technovation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technovation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technovation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technovation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026