Şengül S. Anagün

462 total citations · 1 hit paper
33 papers, 308 citations indexed

About

Şengül S. Anagün is a scholar working on Education, Philosophy and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Şengül S. Anagün has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 308 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Education, 14 papers in Philosophy and 4 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Şengül S. Anagün's work include Education Practices and Challenges (14 papers), Educational Methods and Analysis (13 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (9 papers). Şengül S. Anagün is often cited by papers focused on Education Practices and Challenges (14 papers), Educational Methods and Analysis (13 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (9 papers). Şengül S. Anagün collaborates with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and South Sudan. Şengül S. Anagün's co-authors include Ahmet Kara, Cansu Filik İşçen, Engin Karahan, Burcu Anılan, Pınar Çavaş and Yusuf Ay and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Learning Environments Research and International Journal of Instruction.

In The Last Decade

Şengül S. Anagün

32 papers receiving 272 citations

Hit Papers

Teachers’ Perceptions about the Relationship between 21st... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 40 80 120

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Şengül S. Anagün Türkiye 9 265 60 42 40 15 33 308
Hakan Şevki Ayvacı Türkiye 8 268 1.0× 107 1.8× 26 0.6× 51 1.3× 22 1.5× 90 297
Cihad Şentürk Türkiye 8 205 0.8× 50 0.8× 48 1.1× 23 0.6× 7 0.5× 25 241
Fitnat Kaptan Türkiye 12 268 1.0× 71 1.2× 11 0.3× 55 1.4× 15 1.0× 39 291
Adalet Kandır Türkiye 9 203 0.8× 67 1.1× 20 0.5× 50 1.3× 15 1.0× 48 248
Mehmet Altan Kurnaz Türkiye 11 337 1.3× 83 1.4× 26 0.6× 86 2.1× 23 1.5× 67 371
Ceyhun Ozan Türkiye 9 237 0.9× 78 1.3× 35 0.8× 46 1.1× 16 1.1× 29 279
Molly E. Romano United States 8 248 0.9× 18 0.3× 21 0.5× 61 1.5× 31 2.1× 12 293
Raziye Sancar Türkiye 4 187 0.7× 12 0.2× 41 1.0× 38 0.9× 18 1.2× 14 243
Hülya Demircioğlu Türkiye 9 355 1.3× 38 0.6× 20 0.5× 119 3.0× 21 1.4× 27 393
Adem Yılmaz Türkiye 7 133 0.5× 51 0.8× 46 1.1× 22 0.6× 18 1.2× 31 194

Countries citing papers authored by Şengül S. Anagün

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Şengül S. Anagün's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Şengül S. Anagün with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Şengül S. Anagün more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Şengül S. Anagün

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Şengül S. Anagün. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Şengül S. Anagün. The network helps show where Şengül S. Anagün may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Şengül S. Anagün

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Şengül S. Anagün. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Şengül S. Anagün based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Şengül S. Anagün. Şengül S. Anagün is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Çavaş, Pınar, et al.. (2024). Examining the Mediating Role of STEM Attitudes between STEM Pedagogical Content Knowledge and STEM Intra Class Practice Self-Efficacy. Science education international. 35(1). 13–20. 2 indexed citations
2.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2023). Self-Efficacy Perceptions of 21st Century Skills, Teaching Skills Use and Educational Technology use of Turkish Primary School Teachers: A SEM approach. International Journal of Educational Research Review. 8(3). 582–595. 2 indexed citations
3.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2023). Primary School Students Perceptions about 21st Century Learning Practices. 8(2). 53–68. 3 indexed citations
4.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2022). Primary School Teachers' Perceptions of Digital Culture. International Journal of Progressive Education. 18(1). 397–410. 3 indexed citations
6.
Anılan, Burcu, et al.. (2021). Journey into the Teaching Profession: Experiences of Classroom Teachers. Shanlax International Journal of Education. 9(3). 186–195.
7.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2020). Primary School Teacher Candidates' Experiences Regarding Problem-Based Stem Applications. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 571–598. 4 indexed citations
8.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2018). Current trends in primary school education: Studies published in the journals of faculties of educational sciences carried out in the field of primary-school teacher. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction. 8(3). 503–530. 1 indexed citations
9.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2018). E-Portfolio Implementation Experiences of Prospective Primary School Teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 102–124. 4 indexed citations
10.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2015). SINIF ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARI FEN BİLİMLERİ ÖĞRETİM PROGRAMINI UYGULAMAYA HAZIR MI. Turkish Studies (Elektronik). 10(11). 127–148. 2 indexed citations
11.
Ay, Yusuf, et al.. (2015). SINIF ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARININ FEN ÖĞRETİMİNDE OKUL DIŞI ÖĞRENME HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ. Turkish Studies (Elektronik). 10(15). 103–118. 2 indexed citations
12.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2014). PROBLEM ÇÖZME ENVANTERİNİ İLKÖĞRETİM ÖĞRENCİLERİNE UYARLAMA ÇALIŞMASI: DOĞRULAYICI FAKTÖR ANALİZİ SONUÇLARI. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 13(51). 6 indexed citations
13.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2012). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Öğretme-Öğrenme Sürecine İlişkin İnançlarının Yapılandırmacılık Açısından İncelenmesi. DSpace - AKÜ (Afyon Kocatepe University). 5(1). 1–16. 1 indexed citations
14.
Anagün, Şengül S.. (2011). PISA 2006 Sonuçlarına Göre Öğretme-Öğrenme Süreci Değişkenlerinin Öğrencilerin Fen Okuryazarlıklarına Etkisi. EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. 36(162). 84–102. 2 indexed citations
15.
Anagün, Şengül S.. (2011). The Impact of Teaching-Learning Process Variables to the Students’ Scientific Literacy Levels Based on PISA 2006 Results. TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. 36(162). 84–102. 10 indexed citations
16.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2009). Reliability and Validity Studies of the Science and Technology Course Scientific Attitude Scale. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 6(2). 43–54. 16 indexed citations
17.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2009). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Ödev Sürecine İlişkin Görüşleri. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 10 indexed citations
18.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2009). İlköğretim beşinci sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersinde bilimsel süreç becerilerinin geliştirilmesi. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 8(3). 843–865. 5 indexed citations
19.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2009). Developing Scientific Process Skills at Science And Technology Course in Fifth Grade Students. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 8(3). 11 indexed citations
20.
Anagün, Şengül S., et al.. (2008). İlköğretim Beşinci Sınıf Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Tutum Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences. 8(2). 223–236. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026