Sarah Webber
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 14
- Persona Design and Applications 4
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 3
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 11
- Developmental Biology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Animal and Plant Science Education 11
-
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 15
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 4
-
- Emotion and Mood Recognition 3
Sarah Webber
35 papers receiving 590 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Human-Computer Interaction 242
- Small Animals 138
- Developmental Biology 40
- Applied Psychology 51
- Social Psychology 166
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Webber
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Webber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Webber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Webber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Webber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Webber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Webber. The network helps show where Sarah Webber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Webber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 65 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 79 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 17 | Unbounding the interaction design problem: The contribution of HCI in three interventions for well-being | 2014 | 1 |
| 18 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 1 |
About Sarah Webber
Sarah Webber is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Small Animals, Developmental Biology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (15 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (14 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (11 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Persona Design and Applications (4 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (3 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (242 citations), Small Animals (138 citations), Developmental Biology (40 citations), Applied Psychology (51 citations) and Social Psychology (166 citations). Sarah Webber has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marcus Carter, Wally Smith, Frank Vetere, Sally Sherwen, Greg Wadley, Mitchell Harrop, Bernd Ploderer, Niels Wouters, John Downs and Andrew Vande Moere. Their work appears in journals such as Zoo Biology, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Australasian Journal on Ageing, IEEE Pervasive Computing and Ethics and Information Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.