Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mediating intimacy
2005594 citationsFrank Vetere, Martin Gibbs et al.Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Vetere's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Vetere with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Vetere more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Vetere. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Vetere. The network helps show where Frank Vetere may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Vetere
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Vetere.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Vetere based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Vetere. Frank Vetere is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rogers, Yvonne, Jeni Paay, Margot Brereton, et al.. (2014). Never too old : engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. UCL Discovery (University College London).7 indexed citations
9.
MacDougall, Colin, et al.. (2012). Stepping out : children negotiating independent travel. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).2 indexed citations
Kennedy, Gregor, et al.. (2010). Getting together out-of-class: Using technologies for informal interaction and learning. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne). 2010(1). 387–392.12 indexed citations
Mueller, Florian, Stefan Agamanolis, Martin Gibbs, & Frank Vetere. (2009). Brute force interface: Leveraging intense physical exertion in whole body interactions. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 57–64.1 indexed citations
14.
Gibbs, Martin, Steve Howard, Jesper Kjeldskov, Frank Vetere, & Christine Satchell. (2006). 'Was it Good for you Darling?' – Intimacy, Sex and Critical Technical Practice. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).4 indexed citations
15.
Leong, Tuck Wah, Frank Vetere, & Steve Howard. (2005). The serendipity shuffle. 1–4.28 indexed citations
Graham, Connor, Keith Cheverst, Steve Howard, Jesper Kjeldskov, & Frank Vetere. (2004). Trust in mobile guide design: Exploiting interaction paradigms.2 indexed citations
18.
Carroll, Jennie, Jesper Kjeldskov, Daniel Tobin, & Frank Vetere. (2003). A User-centred Process for Determining Requirements for Mobile Technologies: the TramMate Project. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 47.7 indexed citations
Vetere, Frank, Steve Howard, Sonja Pedell, & Sandrine Balbo. (2003). Walking through mobile use: novel heuristics and their application. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.