This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Pearce more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Pearce. The network helps show where Jon Pearce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jon Pearce
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jon Pearce.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jon Pearce based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jon Pearce. Jon Pearce is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lederman, Reeva, et al.. (2017). Using a Traffic Light System to Provide Feedback to IS Masters Students. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Pang, Patrick Cheong‐Iao, Shanton Chang, Karin Verspoor, & Jon Pearce. (2016). INNOVATION IN DESIGNING HEALTH INFORMATION WEBSITES: RESULTS FROM A QUANTITATIVE STUDY. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 27.2 indexed citations
Pang, Patrick Cheong‐Iao, Karin Verspoor, Shanton Chang, & Jon Pearce. (2014). Designing for Health Exploratory Seeking Behaviour. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 1276. 5–8.2 indexed citations
6.
Pang, Patrick Cheong‐Iao, Shanton Chang, Jon Pearce, & Karin Verspoor. (2014). Online Health Information Seeking Behaviour: Understanding Different Search Approaches. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 229.30 indexed citations
7.
Ploderer, Bernd, et al.. (2014). A mobile app offering distractions and tips to cope with cigarette craving: A qualitative study. Figshare.17 indexed citations
Ainley, Mary, et al.. (2013). More than Enjoyment: Identifying the Positive Affect Component of Interest That Supports Student Engagement and Achievement.. 8(1). 13–32.14 indexed citations
11.
Ploderer, Bernd, Wally Smith, Steve Howard, Jon Pearce, & Ron Borland. (2013). Patterns of support in an online community for smoking cessation. Figshare.1 indexed citations
12.
Ploderer, Bernd, Wally Smith, Steve Howard, Jon Pearce, & Ron Borland. (2012). Things you don't want to know about yourself: Ambivalence about tracking and sharing personal information for behaviour change. Figshare.2 indexed citations
Pearce, Jon. (2008). A System to Encourage Playful Exploration in a Reflective Environment. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2008(1). 1569–1577.1 indexed citations
Kennedy, Gregor, et al.. (2008). Are you bored?. 49–56.4 indexed citations
18.
Mulder, Raoul A. & Jon Pearce. (2007). PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).20 indexed citations
19.
Pearce, Jon. (2005). Engaging the Learner: How Can the Flow Experience Support E-learning?. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne). 2005(1). 2288–2295.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.