Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Strong concepts
2012356 citationsKristina Höök, Jonas LöwgrenACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactionprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Kristina Höök's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kristina Höök with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kristina Höök more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kristina Höök. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kristina Höök. The network helps show where Kristina Höök may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kristina Höök
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kristina Höök.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kristina Höök based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kristina Höök. Kristina Höök is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stepanova, Ekaterina R., Claudia Núñez-Pacheco, Rébecca Kleinberger, et al.. (2023). Corsetto. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 1–23.22 indexed citations
6.
Ståhl, Anna, Jonas Löwgren, & Kristina Höök. (2014). Evocative balance : designing for interactional empowerment. Malmö University Publications (Malmö University). 8(1). 43–57.17 indexed citations
Höök, Kristina, et al.. (2005). Social Positioning : Designing the Seams between Social, Physical and Digital Space. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).20 indexed citations
Bullock, Adrian, Pedro Figueiredo, Patrick Gebhard, et al.. (2004). Affective Interactions for in Real-time Applications: the SAFIRA Project.. Künstliche Intell.. 18. 30.2 indexed citations
Ståhl, Anna, et al.. (2003). Designing Gestures for Affective Input: An Analysis of Shape, Effort and Valence. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 57–65.53 indexed citations
14.
Höök, Kristina, Alan Wexelblat, & Alan Munro. (2000). Social navigation. 375–375.4 indexed citations
15.
Höök, Kristina, Per Persson, & Marie Sjölinder. (2000). Evaluating users' experience of a character-enhanced information space. AI Communications. 13(3). 195–212.25 indexed citations
16.
Munro, Alan, Kristina Höök, & David Benyon. (1999). Personal and Social Navigation of Information Space. Springer eBooks. 284–284.32 indexed citations
17.
Dieberger, Andreas & Kristina Höök. (1999). Applying Social Navigation Principles to the Design of Shared Virtual Spaces. World Conference on WWW and Internet. 1999(1). 289–294.3 indexed citations
18.
Höök, Kristina, et al.. (1997). Edited Adaptive Hypermedia: Combining Human and Machine Intelligence to Achieve Filtered Information. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).19 indexed citations
19.
Wærn, Annika, et al.. (1997). Interactive adaptation of Intranet newsletters.4 indexed citations
20.
Karlgren, Jussi, Kristina Höök, Ann Lantz, Jacob Palme, & Daniel Pargman. (1994). The glass box user model for filtering. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.