Ethics and Information Technology

873 papers and 17.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 873 papers published in Ethics and Information Technology in the last decades have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Ethics and Information Technology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (340 papers), Safety Research (316 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (225 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (310 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (150 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ethics and Information Technology are Luciano Floridi, Amanda Sharkey, Mark Coeckelbergh, Michael Zimmer, Engin Bozdag, Andreas Matthias, Noel Sharkey, Philip Brey, David J. Gunkel and Iyad Rahwan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ethics and Information Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ethics and Information Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ethics and Information Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Ethics and Information Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ethics and Information Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ethics and Information Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethics and Information Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025