This map shows the geographic impact of S. Miedema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Miedema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Miedema more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Miedema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Miedema. The network helps show where S. Miedema may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Miedema
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Miedema.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Miedema based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with S. Miedema. S. Miedema is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
IJzendoorn, Marinus H. van & S. Miedema. (2024). The quality of qualitative research. Medical Humanities. 51(2). 202–206.1 indexed citations
Miedema, S., et al.. (2015). A catalogue of Dutch primary schools in the secular age: empirical results. Religion & Education. 42(2). 202–217.1 indexed citations
4.
Bertram-Troost, G.D. & S. Miedema. (2014). Meeting the ‘others’ in school. On (inter)religious contacts of Dutch pupils in the Dutch dual school system.. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 30(2). 25–31.1 indexed citations
5.
Miedema, S.. (2014). From religious education to worldview education and beyond: The strength of a transformative pedagogical paradigm. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 27(1). 82–103.30 indexed citations
6.
Miedema, S.. (2012). Levensbeschouwelijke vorming in een (post-)seculiere tijd. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
Miedema, S.. (2007). Opvoeden tot Dankbaarheid en Shalom. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
11.
Veugelers, Wiel, et al.. (2007). De Pedagogische functie van het onderwijs op klas- en schoolniveau. Inleiding op het themanummer. Pedagogische Studiën. 84(2). 75–83.1 indexed citations
Miedema, S., et al.. (2003). Vrijheid van onderwijs en sociale cohesie in historisch perspectief. 23(2). 97–108.5 indexed citations
14.
Biesta, Gert, et al.. (2002). Onderwijs en opvoeding en de terugkeer van de religie in een postmoderne samenleving - Inleiding op het themadeel. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 21(2). 124–133.2 indexed citations
15.
Miedema, S., et al.. (2002). Dutch Jewish primary schools in the first half of the nineteenth century: education between modern politics and religious aspirations. 31(2). 16–29.
16.
Miedema, S., et al.. (2001). Onderwijs en sociale integratie. De historische casus van joden in Nederland, 1800-1900. 4(44). 6–24.1 indexed citations
17.
Biesta, Gert & S. Miedema. (1999). Dewey in Europe. Ambivalences and contradictions in the turn-of-the-century educational reform. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).1 indexed citations
18.
Miedema, S., et al.. (1999). Onderwijsvrijheid: een groot pedagogisch goed. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 24(1). 17–33.3 indexed citations
19.
Biesta, Gert, et al.. (1998). Heeft de school een pedagogische opdracht?. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).3 indexed citations
20.
Miedema, S.. (1997). Pedagogiek in meervoud : wegen in het denken over opvoeding en onderwijs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.