Jurjen Iedema
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wilma VolleberghWim MeeusJohan OrmelQuinten A. W. RaaijmakersFilip SmitRob BijlRon de GraafGerard H. Maassen
- Topics
- Family Support in Illness (10 papers)Identity, Memory, and Therapy (8 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyClinical PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Jurjen Iedema
51 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Sociology and Political Science 831
- Clinical Psychology 736
- Social Psychology 537
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 476
- Psychiatry and Mental health 344
Countries citing papers authored by Jurjen Iedema
This map shows the geographic impact of Jurjen Iedema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jurjen Iedema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jurjen Iedema more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jurjen Iedema
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jurjen Iedema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jurjen Iedema. The network helps show where Jurjen Iedema may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jurjen Iedema
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jurjen Iedema. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jurjen Iedema based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jurjen Iedema. Jurjen Iedema is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 103 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | SCP-maat voor lichamelijke beperkingen op basis van AVO 2003 | 18 |
| 9 | 156 | |
| 10 | Relaties met ouders en leeftijdgenoten en identiteitsontwikkeling in de adolescentie | 5 |
| 11 | 426 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Conservatisme in Nederland 1970-1992 : Het belang van leeftijds-, cohort- en sekseverschillen | 1 |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | Verschillen in manier en leeftijd waarop Nederlandse jongeren geboren na 1930 uit huis gaan | 1 |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Jurjen Iedema
Jurjen Iedema is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (10 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (8 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (476 citations), Clinical Psychology (736 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (341 citations). Jurjen Iedema has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Wilma Vollebergh, Wim Meeus, Johan Ormel, Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers, Filip Smit, Rob Bijl, Ron de Graaf, Gerard H. Maassen, Crétien van Campen and Matthijs Poppe. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Schizophrenia Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.