Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Why do trials for Alzheimer’s disease drugs keep failing? A discontinued drug perspective for 2010-2015
2017444 citationsDev Mehta, Robert Jackson et al.Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Jackson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Jackson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Jackson. The network helps show where Robert Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Jackson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Jackson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Jackson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Jackson. Robert Jackson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mehta, Dev, Robert Jackson, Gaurav Paul, Jiong Shi, & Marwan N. Sabbagh. (2017). Why do trials for Alzheimer’s disease drugs keep failing? A discontinued drug perspective for 2010-2015. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 26(6). 735–739.444 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
McKenna, Ursula, Leslie J. Francis, Sean Neill, & Robert Jackson. (2014). The role of personal religiosity in predicting attitude toward religious education and attitude toward religious diversity among 14- to 16-year-old students in England. 30(2). 16.1 indexed citations
6.
Jackson, Robert. (2013). Violet America: Regional Cosmopolitanism in US Fiction since the Great Depression. Nineteenth-Century Literature. 59(4). 681.2 indexed citations
Jackson, Robert. (2005). Language, Power, and Politics: Critical Discourse Analysis and the War on Terrorism, and Reply to Jonathan Rodwell. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).
10.
Jackson, Robert. (2002). An Eclectic Dialectic: TESOL and Literacy in New South Wales. 11(2). 18.1 indexed citations
Jackson, Robert. (1967). Enforcing the Law. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
20.
Johnson, Russell R., et al.. (1951). Flow measurement with orifice meters.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.