Ruth M. Ford
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michelle HoodMichelle M. NeumannJohanna C. van HooffDavid ShumLia KvavilashviliTimothy DriscollDavid L. NeumannSharon Morein‐Zamir
- Topics
- Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers)Cognitive Functions and Memory (7 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ruth M. Ford
33 papers receiving 673 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cognitive Neuroscience 317
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 256
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 223
- Education 222
- Psychiatry and Mental health 134
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth M. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth M. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth M. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth M. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth M. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth M. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth M. Ford. The network helps show where Ruth M. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth M. Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth M. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth M. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth M. Ford. Ruth M. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 85 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Ruth M. Ford
Ruth M. Ford is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 35 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (7 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (256 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (223 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (317 citations). Ruth M. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Hood, Michelle M. Neumann, Johanna C. van Hooff, David Shum, Lia Kvavilashvili, Timothy Driscoll, David L. Neumann, Sharon Morein‐Zamir, Samuel Keating and Rina Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Brain Research and Developmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.