Emma Blakey

840 citations
20 papers · 477 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Blakey

16 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Emma Blakey
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 182
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 207
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 122
  • Sensory Systems 32
  • Statistics and Probability 51
Replace Annie Roy‐Charland with:
Annie Roy‐Charland Canada
David Bridges United Kingdom
Karolina Urton Germany
Adam Oei Singapore
Liat Goldfarb Israel
Aldrich Chan United States
Matthew E. Sachs United States
María Teresa Daza Spain
Nicola K. Ferdinand Germany
Daniel Yon United Kingdom
Emma Blakey relative to Annie Roy‐Charland Canada Annie Roy‐Charland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Annie Roy‐Charland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Blakey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Blakey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Blakey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Blakey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Blakey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Blakey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Blakey. The network helps show where Emma Blakey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Blakey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Blakey Line = papers co-authored together Emma Blakey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2018163
2 201574
3 201553
4 202035
5 202025
6 201622
7 202016
8 201816
9 202315
10 202114
11 201914
12 20239
13 20227
14 20176
15 20204
16 20214
17 20240
18 20250
19 20250
20 20230

About Emma Blakey

Emma Blakey is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (182 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (207 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (122 citations), Sensory Systems (32 citations) and Statistics and Probability (51 citations). Emma Blakey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Carroll, Giulia Poerio, Tom Hostler, Ingmar Visser, Marc J. Buehner, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack, David A. Lagnado, Lily FitzGibbon and Ana B. Vivas. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Educational Psychology Review, Multisensory Research, Child Development Perspectives and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact