Emma Blakey

840 total citations
20 papers, 477 citations indexed

About

Emma Blakey is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Blakey has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 477 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Emma Blakey's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers). Emma Blakey is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers). Emma Blakey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Greece. Emma Blakey's co-authors include Daniel J. Carroll, Tom Hostler, Giulia Poerio, Ingmar Visser, David A. Lagnado, Marc J. Buehner, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack, Lily FitzGibbon and Ana B. Vivas and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Child Development.

In The Last Decade

Emma Blakey

16 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Blakey United Kingdom 11 207 182 122 94 84 20 477
Annie Roy‐Charland Canada 13 328 1.6× 219 1.2× 201 1.6× 77 0.8× 93 1.1× 52 588
Adam Oei Singapore 9 155 0.7× 210 1.2× 192 1.6× 82 0.9× 24 0.3× 15 499
María Teresa Daza Spain 15 195 0.9× 123 0.7× 149 1.2× 129 1.4× 39 0.5× 36 510
Karolina Urton Germany 8 321 1.6× 226 1.2× 119 1.0× 124 1.3× 194 2.3× 24 708
Stéphanie Caillies France 16 253 1.2× 305 1.7× 276 2.3× 68 0.7× 135 1.6× 33 651
Nicola K. Ferdinand Germany 15 557 2.7× 145 0.8× 114 0.9× 35 0.4× 83 1.0× 27 709
David Bridges United Kingdom 8 222 1.1× 150 0.8× 88 0.7× 101 1.1× 89 1.1× 11 492
Liat Goldfarb Israel 13 438 2.1× 188 1.0× 156 1.3× 38 0.4× 68 0.8× 40 609
Matthew E. Sachs United States 13 572 2.8× 185 1.0× 51 0.4× 43 0.5× 404 4.8× 24 854
Caroline Junge Netherlands 13 237 1.1× 139 0.8× 383 3.1× 71 0.8× 40 0.5× 36 581

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Blakey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Blakey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Blakey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Blakey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Blakey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Blakey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Blakey. The network helps show where Emma Blakey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Blakey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Blakey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Blakey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Blakey. Emma Blakey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scerif, Gaia, Emma Blakey, Zachary Hawes, et al.. (2025). Enhancing children’s numeracy and executive functions via their explicit integration. npj Science of Learning. 10(1). 8–8.
2.
Blakey, Emma, et al.. (2025). Becoming a new parent during the pandemic: experiences of pregnancy, birth, and the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 25(1). 39–39.
3.
Bastian, Claudia C. von, et al.. (2024). Do home mathematical activities relate to early mathematical skills? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development. 96(1). 451–468.
4.
Sella, Francesco, et al.. (2023). How do socioeconomic attainment gaps in early mathematical ability arise?. Child Development. 94(6). 1550–1565. 9 indexed citations
5.
Scerif, Gaia, Emma Blakey, Zachary Hawes, et al.. (2023). Making the Executive ‘Function’ for the Foundations of Mathematics: the Need for Explicit Theories of Change for Early Interventions. Educational Psychology Review. 35(4). 15 indexed citations
6.
Carroll, Daniel J., et al.. (2023). Cognitive Flexibility in Early Childhood: A Contemporary View of the Development of Flexible Goal-Oriented Behavior. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 43(2). 171–193.
7.
Blakey, Emma, et al.. (2022). The influence of bilingualism on adolescent cognition: The roles of biculturalism, the bilingual profile, and linguistic similarity. Cognitive Development. 63. 101203–101203. 7 indexed citations
8.
Blakey, Emma, et al.. (2021). Biculturalism, linguistic distance, and bilingual profile effects on the bilingual influence on cognition: A comprehensive multipopulation approach.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(11). 2273–2292. 14 indexed citations
9.
Carroll, Daniel J., Emma Blakey, & Andrew Simpson. (2021). Can We Boost Preschoolers’ Inhibitory Performance Just by Changing the Way They Respond?. Child Development. 92(6). 2205–2212. 4 indexed citations
10.
Bechlivanidis, Christos, David A. Lagnado, Christoph Hoerl, et al.. (2020). Causality influences children’s and adults’ experience of temporal order.. Developmental Psychology. 56(4). 739–755. 4 indexed citations
11.
McCormack, Teresa, et al.. (2020). The developmental profile of temporal binding: From childhood to adulthood. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 73(10). 1575–1586. 16 indexed citations
12.
Blakey, Emma, et al.. (2020). The Role of Executive Functions in Socioeconomic Attainment Gaps: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Child Development. 91(5). 1594–1614. 25 indexed citations
13.
Hoerl, Christoph, et al.. (2020). Temporal Binding, Causation, and Agency: Developing a New Theoretical Framework. Cognitive Science. 44(5). e12843–e12843. 35 indexed citations
15.
Poerio, Giulia, et al.. (2018). More than a feeling: Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) is characterized by reliable changes in affect and physiology. PLoS ONE. 13(6). e0196645–e0196645. 163 indexed citations
16.
Blakey, Emma, et al.. (2018). When causality shapes the experience of time: Evidence for temporal binding in young children. Developmental Science. 22(3). e12769–e12769. 16 indexed citations
17.
Blakey, Emma & Daniel J. Carroll. (2017). Not All Distractions Are the Same: Investigating Why Preschoolers Make Distraction Errors When Switching. Child Development. 89(2). 609–619. 6 indexed citations
18.
Carroll, Daniel J., Emma Blakey, & Lily FitzGibbon. (2016). Cognitive Flexibility in Young Children: Beyond Perseveration. Child Development Perspectives. 10(4). 211–215. 22 indexed citations
19.
Blakey, Emma & Daniel J. Carroll. (2015). A Short Executive Function Training Program Improves Preschoolers’ Working Memory. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1827–1827. 53 indexed citations
20.
Blakey, Emma, Ingmar Visser, & Daniel J. Carroll. (2015). Different Executive Functions Support Different Kinds of Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From 2-, 3-, and 4-Year-Olds. Child Development. 87(2). 513–526. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026