Ruth Crowe

641 citations
20 papers · 470 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Crowe

19 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Ruth Crowe
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Family Practice 37
  • General Dentistry 13
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 171
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Cancer Research 69
Replace Ruth D. Mayforth with:
Ruth D. Mayforth United States
Margaret Wheeler United States
Mallorie B. Heneghan United States
Hongzhang Shen China
Yongyue Qi United States
Catherine Laporte France
Louise Stone United States
C. Di Pietro Italy
Benjamin K. Stoff United States
Nathalie de Lourdes Souza Dewulf Brazil
Ruth Crowe relative to Ruth D. Mayforth United States Ruth D. Mayforth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Ruth D. Mayforth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Crowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Crowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Crowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Crowe. The network helps show where Ruth Crowe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Crowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Crowe Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Crowe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1979123
2 201657
3 197754
4 201747
5 201835
6 201822
7 201621
8 201720
9 201915
10 202113
11 202012
12 202011
13 197711
14 198010
15 20216
16 20156
17
Entrustment Decision Making in the Core Entrustable Professional Activities: Results of a Multi-Institutional Study.
20223
18 20233
19 20241
20 20240

About Ruth Crowe

Ruth Crowe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology and Neurology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (37 citations), General Dentistry (13 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (171 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations) and Cancer Research (69 citations). Ruth Crowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel B. Rifkin, Robert Pollack, Sandra Yingling, Adina Kalet, Steven Hubbard, Victoria Harnik, Verna Monson, Hyuksoon S. Song, Anne McMahon and Kenneth Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dental Education, Academic Medicine, Medical Teacher, Patient Education and Counseling and Journal of Cellular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact