Rosemary Callingham

2.1k total citations
95 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Rosemary Callingham is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and Modeling and Simulation. According to data from OpenAlex, Rosemary Callingham has authored 95 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 76 papers in Education, 54 papers in Statistics and Probability and 18 papers in Modeling and Simulation. Recurrent topics in Rosemary Callingham's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (50 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (40 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (20 papers). Rosemary Callingham is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (50 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (40 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (20 papers). Rosemary Callingham collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Hong Kong and United States. Rosemary Callingham's co-authors include Jane Watson, Kim Beswick, Colin Carmichael, Ben A. Kelly, Helen M. G. Watt, J. Michael Shaughnessy, Seyum Getenet, Kevin F. Collis, Jonathan B. Moritz and Trevor G. Bond and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Education and Information Technologies and School Psychology International.

In The Last Decade

Rosemary Callingham

87 papers receiving 927 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rosemary Callingham Australia 18 833 708 95 89 80 95 1.1k
Liping Ma China 9 1.3k 1.6× 575 0.8× 66 0.7× 111 1.2× 210 2.6× 20 1.4k
Tim Rowland United Kingdom 16 1.1k 1.3× 461 0.7× 62 0.7× 87 1.0× 175 2.2× 52 1.2k
Marilyn P. Carlson United States 13 1.1k 1.3× 511 0.7× 78 0.8× 101 1.1× 309 3.9× 31 1.2k
Ruhama Even Israel 18 1.4k 1.7× 624 0.9× 47 0.5× 134 1.5× 275 3.4× 48 1.5k
Bárbara J. Reys United States 21 1.2k 1.4× 750 1.1× 68 0.7× 189 2.1× 207 2.6× 85 1.4k
Katie Makar Australia 19 664 0.8× 700 1.0× 33 0.3× 35 0.4× 117 1.5× 83 1.1k
Marjorie A. Henningsen United States 4 1.4k 1.7× 625 0.9× 56 0.6× 174 2.0× 364 4.5× 5 1.6k
Torulf Palm Sweden 15 843 1.0× 233 0.3× 28 0.3× 78 0.9× 206 2.6× 41 1000
Helen Chick Australia 18 711 0.9× 455 0.6× 55 0.6× 78 0.9× 121 1.5× 85 913
Lianghuo Fan United Kingdom 15 963 1.2× 332 0.5× 36 0.4× 177 2.0× 124 1.6× 57 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Callingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Callingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Callingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Callingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Callingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Callingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Callingham. The network helps show where Rosemary Callingham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary Callingham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary Callingham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary Callingham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary Callingham. Rosemary Callingham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Watson, Jane & Rosemary Callingham. (2017). Developing learning progressions to support mathematical reasoning in the middle years: statistical reasoning. UTAS Research Repository. 1 indexed citations
2.
Watson, Jane, Rosemary Callingham, & Lyn D. English. (2017). Students' development of statistical literacy in the upper primary years. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
3.
Getenet, Seyum & Rosemary Callingham. (2017). Teaching fractions for understanding: addressing interrelated concepts. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 2017. 277–284. 8 indexed citations
4.
Beswick, Kim, et al.. (2014). The use of interactive whiteboards in education: Opportunities and challenges. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
5.
Beswick, Kim, et al.. (2014). Factors Influencing Mathematics Achievement among Secondary School Students: A Review. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 3 indexed citations
6.
Beswick, Kim, et al.. (2013). Increasing the LD50 of mathematics: Re-engaging students in mathematics learning. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 3 indexed citations
7.
Callingham, Rosemary. (2012). Cross-cultural research in mathematics education: Challenges and opportunities. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
8.
Callingham, Rosemary, et al.. (2011). The use of language in the mathematics classroom. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
9.
Beswick, Kim, Jane Watson, Natalie Brown, Rosemary Callingham, & Suzie Wright. (2011). Student attitude change associated with teacher professional learning in Mathematics. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
10.
Watson, Jane, Kim Beswick, Natalie Brown, et al.. (2011). Digging into Australian Data with Tinkerplots. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
11.
Beswick, Kim, et al.. (2011). Teachers' and pre-service teachers' confidence to teach primary school mathematics. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1–10. 7 indexed citations
13.
Callingham, Rosemary & John Pegg. (2010). Using Developmental Frameworks to Support Curriculum outcomes. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 125–132. 1 indexed citations
14.
Callingham, Rosemary, et al.. (2009). Changing Teachers' Classroom Practice through Developmental Assessment: Constraints, Concerns and Unintended Impacts. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1(3). 81–88. 4 indexed citations
15.
Callingham, Rosemary. (2008). Dialogue and Feedback: Assessment in the Primary Mathematics Classroom.. RUNE (Research UNE). 13(3). 18–21. 9 indexed citations
16.
Taylor, Neil, et al.. (2006). The impact of an Education for Sustainability unit on the knowledge and attitudes of pre-service primary teachers at an Australian university. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 17 indexed citations
17.
Watson, Jane, Ben A. Kelly, Rosemary Callingham, & J. Michael Shaughnessy. (2003). The measurement of school students' understanding of statistical variation. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 34(1). 1–29. 90 indexed citations
18.
Callingham, Rosemary & Alistair McIntosh. (2002). Mental Computation Competence Across Years 3 to 10. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 13 indexed citations
19.
Callingham, Rosemary & Patrick Griffin. (2001). Beyond the Basics: Improving Indigenous Students' Numeracy. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
20.
Callingham, Rosemary. (2000). Come in Spinner!: Innovative Assessment in the Primary Classroom.. Australian primary mathematics classroom/Australian primary mathematics classroom (Online). 5(1). 9–14. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026