Robyn E. Goodwin

703 citations
5 papers · 531 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Robyn E. Goodwin

5 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Robyn E. Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 315
  • Sociology and Political Science 375
  • Social Psychology 164
  • General Health Professions 153
  • Leadership and Management 7
Replace C. Brotheridge with:
C. Brotheridge Canada
O. Oko Elechi United States
Arpana Rai India
Anna F. Schewe Netherlands
Miguel A. Mañas Spain
Jennifer Bunk United States
Gregory A. Vinson United States
kang Hyun Shin South Korea
Misty Marie Bennett United States
Meredith H. Croyle United States
Robyn E. Goodwin relative to C. Brotheridge Canada C. Brotheridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C. Brotheridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robyn E. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robyn E. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robyn E. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robyn E. Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robyn E. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robyn E. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robyn E. Goodwin. The network helps show where Robyn E. Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Robyn E. Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robyn E. Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Robyn E. Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Robyn E. Goodwin

Robyn E. Goodwin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper), Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (315 citations), Sociology and Political Science (375 citations), Social Psychology (164 citations), General Health Professions (153 citations) and Leadership and Management (7 citations). Robyn E. Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Markus Groth, Alicia A. Grandey, Su Chuen Foo, Stephen J. Frenkel, Barbara Mullan, Helena Nguyen, Karyn L. Wang and Anya Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as British Food Journal, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Applied Psychology and Nutrition & Dietetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact