Robert Pieper
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.1%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Gut microbiota and health 37
-
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 46
- Co-authors
- Jürgen Zentek (52 shared papers)Wilfried Vahjen (28 shared papers)Andrew G. Van Kessel (15 shared papers)W. B. Souffrant (11 shared papers)Paweł Janczyk (13 shared papers)Konrad Neumann (9 shared papers)Jérôme Bindelle (10 shared papers)Hauke Smidt (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Robert Pieper
129 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Animal Science and Zoology 1.8k
- Small Animals 492
- Nutrition and Dietetics 1.0k
- Food Science 984
- Agronomy and Crop Science 348
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Pieper
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Pieper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Pieper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Pieper. The network helps show where Robert Pieper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 133 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 179 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 156 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 148 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 140 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 117 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 106 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 98 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 85 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 84 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 80 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 79 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 79 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 75 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 72 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 72 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 71 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 69 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 65 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 65 |
About Robert Pieper
Robert Pieper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 133 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (46 papers), Gut microbiota and health (37 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (33 papers), Trace Elements in Health (20 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (13 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (13 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (1.8k citations), Small Animals (492 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.0k citations), Food Science (984 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (348 citations). Robert Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Zentek, Wilfried Vahjen, Andrew G. Van Kessel, W. B. Souffrant, Paweł Janczyk, Konrad Neumann, Jérôme Bindelle, Hauke Smidt, Fabienne Ferrara and Pascal Leterme. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Archives of Animal Nutrition, Animal Feed Science and Technology, PLoS ONE and FEMS Microbiology Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.