Nadia Everaert
Impact in
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.1%
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Livestock and Poultry Management
- Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
- Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Aquatic Science top 1%
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Papers in
-
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 97
- Livestock and Poultry Management 17
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 16
- Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health 14
-
- Gut microbiota and health 24
- Co-authors
- Eddy Decuypere (43 shared papers)Johan Buyse (47 shared papers)V. Bruggeman (19 shared papers)H. Willemsen (17 shared papers)Jérôme Bindelle (20 shared papers)M. Debonne (12 shared papers)K. Tona (14 shared papers)A. Witters (11 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Nadia Everaert
165 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Animal Science and Zoology 2.2k
- Aquatic Science 423
- Small Animals 332
- Nutrition and Dietetics 520
- Food Science 416
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Everaert
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Everaert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Everaert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Everaert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Everaert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Everaert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Everaert. The network helps show where Nadia Everaert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Everaert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 173 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 145 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 105 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 103 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 103 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 102 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 100 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 89 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 87 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 68 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 66 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 66 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 63 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 59 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 59 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 58 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 58 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 57 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 53 |
About Nadia Everaert
Nadia Everaert is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology and Small Animals, having authored 173 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (97 papers), Gut microbiota and health (24 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (17 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (17 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (17 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (16 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (15 papers) and Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (2.2k citations), Aquatic Science (423 citations), Small Animals (332 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (520 citations) and Food Science (416 citations). Nadia Everaert has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, China and Togo. Frequent co-authors include Eddy Decuypere, Johan Buyse, V. Bruggeman, H. Willemsen, Jérôme Bindelle, M. Debonne, K. Tona, A. Witters, L. De Smit and Zhigang Song. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, animal, British Journal Of Nutrition and Journal of Animal Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.