Robert L. Birmingham
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Marketing top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Gender Studies
- Topics
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers)Legal principles and applications (3 papers)Law in Society and Culture (2 papers)
- Journals
- NoûsEthicsStanford Law Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert L. Birmingham
20 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Sociology and Political Science 213
- Marketing 187
- Information Systems and Management 56
- Economics and Econometrics 54
- Gender Studies 40
Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Birmingham
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Birmingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Birmingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Birmingham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert L. Birmingham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Birmingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Birmingham. The network helps show where Robert L. Birmingham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert L. Birmingham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert L. Birmingham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert L. Birmingham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert L. Birmingham. Robert L. Birmingham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Folk Psychology and Legal Understanding | 1 |
| 2 | A Study After Cardozo: De Cicco v. Schweizer , Noncooperative Games, and Neural Computing | 1 |
| 3 | A Rose by Any Other Word: Mutual Mistake in Sherwood v. Walker | 0 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Holmes on Peerless: Raffles v. Wichelhaus and the Objective Theory of Contract | 1 |
| 6 | Hart's Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence Again | 3 |
| 7 | Remarks on Probability in Law: Mostly, a Casenote and a Book Review | 1 |
| 8 | Breach of Contract, Damage Measures, and Economic Efficiency | 30 |
| 9 | A Model of Criminal Process: Game Theory and Law | 1 |
| 10 | The Theory of Economic Policy and the Law of Torts | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Economic Integration in East Africa: Distribution of Gains | 1 |
| 15 | A Second Look at the Suez Canal Cases: Excuse for Nonperformance of Contractual Obligations in the Light of Economic Theory | 1 |
| 16 | The Consumer as King: The Economics of Precarious Sovereignty | 1 |
| 17 | Legal and Moral Duty in Game Theory: Common Law Contract and Chinese Analogies | 8 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Robert L. Birmingham
Robert L. Birmingham is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics and History, having authored 25 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers), Legal principles and applications (3 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (187 citations), Information Systems and Management (56 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (213 citations). Robert L. Birmingham has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Raymond A. Bauer, Stephen A. Greyser, Derk Bodde and Clarence Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, Ethics and Stanford Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.