Stanford Law Review

2.0k papers and 43.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Stanford Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 43.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Stanford Law Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (610 papers), Law (583 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (367 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (311 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (167 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (157 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stanford Law Review are Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, Albert Bandura, Richard A. Posner, Cass R. Sunstein, Ronald J. Gilson, Mark J. Roe, Angela P. Harris, Gunnar Myrdal, Lawrence J. Lau and Lucian A. Bebchuk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Stanford Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Stanford Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stanford Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Stanford Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stanford Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stanford Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanford Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026