Janice Foley

468 total citations
12 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Janice Foley is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Janice Foley has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Public Administration, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Janice Foley's work include Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers). Janice Foley is often cited by papers focused on Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers). Janice Foley collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Janice Foley's co-authors include William E. Kilbourne, Marko Grünhagen, Michael Polanyi, Brian Bemmels, Michael J. Dorsch, Bertrand Urien, Michael Jay Polonsky, David Marshall, Alan Bradshaw and Pierre McDonagh and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Management, Journal of Economic Psychology and Work Employment and Society.

In The Last Decade

Janice Foley

12 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janice Foley Canada	8	120	96	86	67	54	12	332
Kirsi Eräranta Finland	8	73 0.6×	143 1.5×	45 0.5×	26 0.4×	18 0.3×	18	308
Mary L. Joyce United States	9	125 1.0×	61 0.6×	83 1.0×	20 0.3×	37 0.7×	17	315
Zachary A. Russell United States	9	40 0.3×	127 1.3×	120 1.4×	16 0.2×	52 1.0×	21	288
Katherine K. Chen United States	12	30 0.3×	177 1.8×	108 1.3×	34 0.5×	22 0.4×	22	315
Murat Yeşiltaş Türkiye	11	110 0.9×	108 1.1×	221 2.6×	5 0.1×	89 1.6×	41	442
John T. King United States	8	73 0.6×	214 2.2×	26 0.3×	15 0.2×	23 0.4×	23	395
Yu-Ling Ho Taiwan	5	73 0.6×	68 0.7×	123 1.4×	9 0.1×	55 1.0×	9	337
Julia Kiely United Kingdom	10	33 0.3×	109 1.1×	101 1.2×	15 0.2×	47 0.9×	24	305
Amy Thurlow Canada	7	19 0.2×	128 1.3×	174 2.0×	28 0.4×	40 0.7×	18	414
Patricia Gayá Wicks United Kingdom	6	73 0.6×	106 1.1×	60 0.7×	8 0.1×	14 0.3×	6	377

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Foley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Foley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Foley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Foley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Foley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Foley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Foley. The network helps show where Janice Foley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice Foley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice Foley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice Foley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice Foley. Janice Foley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

Parker, Jane & Janice Foley. (2010). Progress on Women’s Equality within UK and Canadian Trade Unions: Do Women’s Structures Make a Difference?. Relations industrielles. 65(2). 281–303. 5 indexed citations

Foley, Janice, et al.. (2009). Unions, equity, and the path to renewal. 7 indexed citations

Foley, Janice. (2009). Redistributing union power to women : the experiences of two women’s committees. Open Collections. 1 indexed citations

Kilbourne, William E., Michael J. Dorsch, Pierre McDonagh, et al.. (2009). The Institutional Foundations of Materialism in Western Societies. Journal of Macromarketing. 29(3). 259–278. 54 indexed citations

Foley, Janice. (2008). Service delivery reform within the Canadian public sector 1990‐2002. Employee Relations. 30(3). 283–303. 14 indexed citations

Foley, Janice & Michael Polanyi. (2006). Workplace Democracy: Why Bother?. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 27(1). 173–191. 53 indexed citations

Foley, Janice. (2006). Explaining Local Unions’ Responses to Globalization. Relations industrielles. 61(1). 44–69. 3 indexed citations

Kilbourne, William E., Marko Grünhagen, & Janice Foley. (2005). A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between materialism and individual values. Journal of Economic Psychology. 26(5). 624–641. 124 indexed citations

Foley, Janice. (2003). Mobilization and Change in a Trade Union Setting: Environment, Structures and Action. Work Employment and Society. 17(2). 247–268. 13 indexed citations

10.

Foley, Janice. (2000). Developing an Explanatory Framework for the Demise of a Women's Committee. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 21(4). 505–531. 6 indexed citations

11.

Bemmels, Brian & Janice Foley. (1996). Grievance Procedure Research: A Review and Theoretical Recommendations. Journal of Management. 22(3). 359–384. 45 indexed citations

12.

Foley, Janice & Rodney A. Clifton. (1990). Locus of Control, Organizational Climate, and Participation in Staff Development: A Study of College Instructors. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 20(2). 45–59. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact