Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Seidel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Seidel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Seidel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Seidel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Seidel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Seidel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Seidel. The network helps show where Robert J. Seidel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert J. Seidel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert J. Seidel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert J. Seidel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert J. Seidel. Robert J. Seidel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Seidel, Robert J., et al.. (1997). Virtual Reality Training's Future: Perspectives on Virtual Reality and Related Emerging Technologies. Medical Entomology and Zoology.45 indexed citations
4.
Seidel, Robert J., et al.. (1994). Learning without boundaries : technology to support distance/distributed learning. Plenum Press eBooks.6 indexed citations
5.
Perez, Ray S. & Robert J. Seidel. (1990). Using artificial intelligence in education: computer-based tools for instructional development. Educational Technology archive. 30(3). 108–115.4 indexed citations
6.
Park, Ok-choon & Robert J. Seidel. (1990). Conventional CBI versus Intelligent CAI: suggestions for the development of future systems. Educational Technology archive. 27(5). 139–145.2 indexed citations
7.
Park, Ok-choon & Robert J. Seidel. (1989). Evaluation Criteria for Selecting a CBI Authoring System. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 17(2). 61.5 indexed citations
8.
Park, Ok-choon, Ray S. Perez, & Robert J. Seidel. (1987). Intelligent CAI: Old wine in new bottles, or a new vintage?. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks. 11–45.27 indexed citations
9.
Seidel, Robert J.. (1986). Deriving correct pattern descriptions and rules for the KRK endgame by deductive methods. 19–36.2 indexed citations
10.
Seidel, Robert J. & Lawrence M. Stolurow. (1980). An Heuristic Meta-Model for Computer-Managed Instruction.. Journal of research and development in education. 14(1). 16–32.2 indexed citations
11.
Seidel, Robert J.. (1978). Tips for Managing CAI Projects.. Educational Technology archive.1 indexed citations
Seidel, Robert J., et al.. (1977). Computers and communication : implications for education. Academic Press eBooks.9 indexed citations
14.
Seidel, Robert J.. (1974). Obstacles to Widespread Use of Computer-Based Curricular Innovations: A Review. The Journal of Computer Based Instruction. 1(1). 28–31.2 indexed citations
15.
Seidel, Robert J., et al.. (1973). Research on Instructional Decision Models.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
16.
Seidel, Robert J.. (1971). Where the data are.. Contemporary Psychology. 16(1). 46–46.1 indexed citations
17.
Seidel, Robert J.. (1969). Is CAI Cost/Effective? The Right Question at the Wrong Time.. Educational Technology archive. 9(5).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.