Robert Farrow

58 papers receiving 721 citations

Peers

Robert Farrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Computer Science Applications 382
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 19
  • Education 220
  • Information Systems 124
Replace Vasile Gherheș with:
Vasile Gherheș Romania
Rafiza Abdul Razak Malaysia
John Williams Australia
Diptiranjan Mahapatra India
Junfeng Yang China
David Aguado Spain
Néstor Darío Duque Méndez Colombia
Sarah Cornelius United Kingdom
Bingcheng Wang China
Anna Shutaleva Russia
Robert Farrow relative to Vasile Gherheș Romania Vasile Gherheș's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Vasile Gherheș · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Farrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Farrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Farrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Farrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Farrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Farrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Farrow. The network helps show where Robert Farrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Farrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Farrow Line = papers co-authored together Robert Farrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201568
2 202253
3 200553
4 201342
5 201542
6 201531
7 201226
8 200226
9 202325
10 201323
11 202322
12 202021
13 201621
14 201920
15 201619
16 200419
17
OER Evidence Report 2013-2014
201419
18 202218
19 200018
20 201617

About Robert Farrow

Robert Farrow is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 67 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Open Education and E-Learning (26 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (20 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (12 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (7 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers), Educational Innovations and Challenges (3 papers), Water resources management and optimization (3 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (382 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (19 citations), Education (220 citations) and Information Systems (124 citations). Robert Farrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Martin Weller, Patrick McAndrew, Rebecca Pitt, Beatriz de los Arcos, Markus Deimann, M Schultz, Mitchell J. Small, Ioanna Iacovides, George Van Houtven and Paul S. Fischbeck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Interactive Media in Education, Environmental Science & Technology, British Journal of Educational Technology, Learning Media and Technology and The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact