Rebecca Pitt

570 total citations
29 papers, 378 citations indexed

About

Rebecca Pitt is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca Pitt has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 378 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Computer Science Applications, 7 papers in Education and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Rebecca Pitt's work include Open Education and E-Learning (19 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (10 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers). Rebecca Pitt is often cited by papers focused on Open Education and E-Learning (19 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (10 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers). Rebecca Pitt collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Chile. Rebecca Pitt's co-authors include Robert Farrow, Martin Weller, Beatriz de los Arcos, Patrick McAndrew, Tim Coughlan, Rajiv S. Jhangiani, Jessie A. Key, Mary Ellen Macdonald, Katy Jordan and Francisco Iniesto and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, British Journal of Educational Technology and Journal of comparative psychology.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca Pitt

28 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rebecca Pitt United Kingdom	12	267	101	48	27	16	29	378
Pauline Salim Muljana United States	7	96 0.4×	164 1.6×	39 0.8×	42 1.6×	14 0.9×	26	260
Joshua Littenberg‐Tobias United States	7	85 0.3×	146 1.4×	37 0.8×	27 1.0×	11 0.7×	23	243
José Luis Serrano Sánchez Spain	9	134 0.5×	119 1.2×	205 4.3×	24 0.9×	13 0.8×	44	284
Ibtehal Mahmoud Aburezeq United Arab Emirates	5	50 0.2×	86 0.9×	35 0.7×	42 1.6×	7 0.4×	30	239
Enilda Romero‐Hall United States	11	52 0.2×	145 1.4×	81 1.7×	50 1.9×	23 1.4×	37	279
Malissa Maria Mahmud Malaysia	9	38 0.1×	132 1.3×	69 1.4×	32 1.2×	14 0.9×	59	243
Stijn Van Laer Belgium	6	88 0.3×	182 1.8×	58 1.2×	93 3.4×	7 0.4×	9	250
Anne Kristine Petersen Denmark	5	109 0.4×	267 2.6×	92 1.9×	53 2.0×	10 0.6×	9	381
Beth Oyarzun United States	10	70 0.3×	178 1.8×	36 0.8×	71 2.6×	8 0.5×	22	246
Søren Hattesen Balle	2	95 0.4×	242 2.4×	79 1.6×	42 1.6×	10 0.6×	2	326

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Pitt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Pitt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Pitt. The network helps show where Rebecca Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Pitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Pitt. Rebecca Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Iniesto, Francisco, Rebecca Ferguson, Martin Weller, Robert Farrow, & Rebecca Pitt. (2022). Introducing A Reflective Framework for the Assessment and Recognition of Microcredentials. 2(2). 1–24. 5 indexed citations

Farrow, Robert, et al.. (2021). Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 15–26. 9 indexed citations

Farrow, Robert, Francisco Iniesto, Martin Weller, & Rebecca Pitt. (2020). GO-GN Research Methods Handbook. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 11 indexed citations

Pitt, Rebecca, Katy Jordan, Beatriz de los Arcos, Robert Farrow, & Martin Weller. (2020). Supporting open educational practices through open textbooks. Distance Education. 41(2). 303–318. 21 indexed citations

Farrow, Robert, Rebecca Pitt, & Martin Weller. (2020). Open Textbooks as an innovation route for open science pedagogy. Education for Information. 36(3). 227–245. 9 indexed citations

Weller, Martin, Beatriz de los Arcos, Patrick McAndrew, & Rebecca Pitt. (2018). Identifying Categories of Open Educational Resource Users. 1(1). 5 indexed citations

Vega, Eduardo A., et al.. (2018). Chronic non-cancer pain in children: we have a problem, but also solutions. Minerva Anestesiologica. 84(9). 1081–1092. 16 indexed citations

Coughlan, Tim, Rebecca Pitt, & Robert Farrow. (2018). Forms of innovation inspired by open educational resources: a post-project analysis. Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning. 34(2). 156–175. 11 indexed citations

Pitt, Rebecca, et al.. (2017). The MOOC potential to address European challenges in CPD and continuous education. Open Research Online (The Open University). 4 indexed citations

10.

Jhangiani, Rajiv S., et al.. (2016). Exploring Faculty Use of Open Educational Resources at British Columbia post-secondary institutions. Open Research Online (The Open University). 42 indexed citations

11.

Arcos, Beatriz de los, Robert Farrow, Rebecca Pitt, Martin Weller, & Patrick McAndrew. (2016). Adapting the Curriculum: How K-12 Teachers Perceive the Role of Open Educational Resources. Open Research Online (The Open University). 2(1). 23–40. 21 indexed citations

12.

Farrow, Robert, Beatriz de los Arcos, Rebecca Pitt, & Martin Weller. (2016). Who are the Open Learners? A Comparative Study Profiling Non-Formal Users of Open Educational Resources. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning. 18(2). 49–73. 19 indexed citations

13.

Pitt, Rebecca. (2015). Jean-Paul Sartre: Key Concepts Jean-Paul Sartre: Key Concepts . Edited by Steven Churchill and Jack Reynolds. Durham: Acumen, 2013. xii + 244 pp.. French Studies. 69(1). 108–109. 2 indexed citations

14.

Farrow, Robert, et al.. (2015). Impact of OER use on teaching and learning: Data from OER Research Hub. British Journal of Educational Technology. 46(5). 8 indexed citations

15.

Pitt, Rebecca, et al.. (2015). Low-income working immigrant families in Quebec: Exploring their challenges to well-being. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 106(8). e539–e545. 20 indexed citations

16.

Arcos, Beatriz de los, et al.. (2015). OER Research Hub Data 2013-2015: Educators. Open Research Online (The Open University). 3 indexed citations

17.

Pitt, Rebecca. (2015). Mainstreaming Open Textbooks: Educator Perspectives on the Impact of OpenStax College open textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 16(4). 52 indexed citations

18.

Coughlan, Tim, Rebecca Pitt, & Patrick McAndrew. (2013). Building open bridges. Open Research Online (The Open University). 991–1000. 12 indexed citations

19.

Pitt, Rebecca, et al.. (2013). Assessing OER impact across organisations and learners: experiences from the Bridge to Success project. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2013(3). 17–17. 21 indexed citations

20.

Murphy, Mary Ann, et al.. (2008). Understanding of visual attention by adult humans (Homo sapiens): A partial replication of Povinelli, Bierschwale, and Čech (1999).. Journal of comparative psychology. 122(4). 428–436. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact