Rebecca Pitt
- Computer Science Applications top 1%
- Education top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Communication
- Co-authors
- Robert FarrowMartin WellerBeatriz de los ArcosPatrick McAndrewTim CoughlanJessie A. KeyRajiv S. JhangianiMary Ellen Macdonald
- Topics
- Open Education and E-Learning (19 papers)Online Learning and Analytics (10 papers)Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBritish Journal of Educational TechnologyJournal of comparative psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaChile
In The Last Decade
Rebecca Pitt
28 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Computer Science Applications 267
- Education 101
- Information Systems 48
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 27
- Communication 16
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Pitt. The network helps show where Rebecca Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Pitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Pitt. Rebecca Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | The MOOC potential to address European challenges in CPD and continuous education | 4 |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Impact of OER use on teaching and learning: Data from OER Research Hub | 8 |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | OER Research Hub Data 2013-2015: Educators | 3 |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Rebecca Pitt
Rebecca Pitt is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education and Information Systems and Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Open Education and E-Learning (19 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (10 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (267 citations), Education (101 citations) and Communication (16 citations). Rebecca Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Robert Farrow, Martin Weller, Beatriz de los Arcos, Patrick McAndrew, Tim Coughlan, Jessie A. Key, Rajiv S. Jhangiani, Mary Ellen Macdonald, Katy Jordan and Francisco Iniesto. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, British Journal of Educational Technology and Journal of comparative psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.