Robert Christopherson

728 total citations
9 papers, 116 citations indexed

About

Robert Christopherson is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Christopherson has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 116 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Robert Christopherson's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (4 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers). Robert Christopherson is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (4 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers). Robert Christopherson collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Robert Christopherson's co-authors include Lijia Lin, Robert K. Atkinson, Robert Atkinson, Winslow Burleson, Kurt VanLehn, Lishan Zhang, David Gibson, Hale Ilgaz and Mustafa Gökçe Baydoğan and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Education, Behaviour and Information Technology and EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology.

In The Last Decade

Robert Christopherson

9 papers receiving 112 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert Christopherson United States 5 57 43 34 30 24 9 116
Nicholas V. Mudrick United States 7 94 1.6× 48 1.1× 43 1.3× 46 1.5× 50 2.1× 11 168
Eda Okur United States 8 47 0.8× 66 1.5× 35 1.0× 26 0.9× 72 3.0× 15 162
Athanasios Psaltis Greece 4 30 0.5× 30 0.7× 10 0.3× 30 1.0× 22 0.9× 13 101
Celeste Pilegard United States 8 90 1.6× 36 0.8× 39 1.1× 42 1.4× 24 1.0× 13 152
Julia Cohen United States 6 44 0.8× 25 0.6× 109 3.2× 33 1.1× 24 1.0× 6 188
Karen Roehr United Kingdom 7 158 2.8× 16 0.4× 30 0.9× 33 1.1× 11 0.5× 13 264
Sophie Thompson‐Lee United Kingdom 3 123 2.2× 59 1.4× 16 0.5× 32 1.1× 9 0.4× 9 230
Bronson Hui United States 9 93 1.6× 36 0.8× 19 0.6× 38 1.3× 4 0.2× 26 216
Florian Sense Netherlands 7 41 0.7× 69 1.6× 20 0.6× 28 0.9× 32 1.3× 31 198
Christina Sanchez‐Stockhammer Germany 5 30 0.5× 66 1.5× 20 0.6× 43 1.4× 15 0.6× 8 176

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Christopherson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Christopherson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Christopherson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Christopherson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Christopherson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Christopherson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Christopherson. The network helps show where Robert Christopherson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Christopherson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Christopherson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Christopherson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Christopherson. Robert Christopherson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Christopherson, Robert, et al.. (2022). Facebook usage patterns looking into the mind via the ICAP engagement framework. Behaviour and Information Technology. 42(5). 514–526. 5 indexed citations
2.
Lin, Lijia, Mustafa Gökçe Baydoğan, Robert Christopherson, et al.. (2013). Affect Recognition in Learning Scenarios: Matching Facial- and BCI-Based Values. 2. 70–71. 2 indexed citations
3.
Lin, Lijia, et al.. (2013). Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter?. Computers & Education. 67. 239–249. 76 indexed citations
4.
Christopherson, Robert, et al.. (2012). BrainBook: Instructional Design Leveraging Social Networking Features Increases Motivation and Engagement. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2012(1). 1159–1166. 1 indexed citations
5.
Christopherson, Robert, et al.. (2012). Lost in the dark. 79–80. 11 indexed citations
6.
VanLehn, Kurt, et al.. (2011). The Affective Meta-Tutoring Project: How to motivate students to use effective meta-cognitive strategies. International Conference on Computers in Education. 11 indexed citations
7.
Christopherson, Robert, et al.. (2011). How to Do Multimodal Detection of Affective States?. 654–655. 5 indexed citations
8.
VanLehn, Kurt, et al.. (2011). The level up procedure: How to measure learning gains without pre- and post-testing. 96–100. 2 indexed citations
9.
Atkinson, Robert, et al.. (2009). Does the Type and Degree of Animation Present in a Visual Representation Accompanying Narration in a Multimedia Environment Impact Learning. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2009(1). 726–734. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicholas V. Mudrick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eda Okur Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Athanasios Psaltis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Celeste Pilegard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julia Cohen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen Roehr Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sophie Thompson‐Lee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bronson Hui Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Florian Sense Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christina Sanchez‐Stockhammer
Rankless by CCL
2026